Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maria Mateas vs Chanelle Van Nguyen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mateas vs Nguyen analysis and find out who is favored!
Maria Mateas vs Chanelle Van Nguyen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mateas 1 - 0 Nguyen
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mateas has won 46.32% of points on his second serve, while Nguyen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mateas, in recent form, has won 57.59% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nguyen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.75% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mateas has saved 59.12% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nguyen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mateas has won 58.57% of matches played (W/L 41/ 29), with Nguyen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mateas has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 14/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 93/ 79). Nguyen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 56/ 42), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Mateas has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.21% of matches (W/L 39/ 28), where as Nguyen has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mateas winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Mateas winning 2 and Nguyen winning 1. The last match between Mateas and Nguyen was at the W25 Orlando, 14-11-2019, Second, Clay with Maria Mateas getting the victory 6-2 4-6 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:12:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mateas and Nguyen have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mateas winning 1 times and Nguyen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mateas winning 0, and Nguyen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mateas has played against opponents with an average rank of 235.23 while Nguyen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mateas has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nguyen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mateas has converted 53.47% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nguyen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mateas 1 - 0 Nguyen
268
Rank
265
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
808
Rank
350
High
30
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
55% (205-165)
Career Total W/L
56% (143-114)
58% (18-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$13,868
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Maria Mateas | Chanelle Van Nguyen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:12:0 | 3:12:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (54/88) | 68% (66/97) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (31/54) | 36% (24/66) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 32% (11/34) | 52% (16/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 59% (10/17) | 50% (7/14) |
| Return Points W% | 59% (57/97) | 52% (46/88) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 4-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Maria Mateas
Player
Chanelle Van Nguyen
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
52%
(
46 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
57 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maria Mateas | Chanelle Van Nguyen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (18/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (41/28) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (359/290) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (10/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 46 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 64 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:44 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 274.03 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (1553/2197) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (947/1553) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (316/644) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (137/263) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (990/2115) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 58% (18/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (18/30) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 17% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (19/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (19/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Maria Mateas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Akasha Urhobo
Player
Maria Mateas
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Ema Burgic Bucko
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
8
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
23%
(
3 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
52%
(
33 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Martina Okalova
78%
(
66 of
85)
1st Serve %
85%
(
44 of
52)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
46%
(
39 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
79
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hanna Chang
Player
Maria Mateas
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
46%
(
45 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
104)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 0-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Kathinka Von Deichmann
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve %
80%
(
41 of
51)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Melany Solange Krywoj
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lulu Sun
Player
Maria Mateas
64%
(
67 of
105)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
40%
(
42 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Martina Okalova
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sophie Chang
Player
Maria Mateas
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nuria Parrizas-Diaz
Player
Maria Mateas
72%
(
69 of
96)
1st Serve %
76%
(
72 of
95)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Chanelle Van Nguyen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Swan
Player
Chanelle Van Nguyen
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elvina Kalieva
Player
Chanelle Van Nguyen
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
76%
(
51 of
67)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
77%
(
23 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hanna Chang
Player
Chanelle Van Nguyen
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chanelle Van Nguyen
Player
Rhiann Newborn
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chanelle Van Nguyen
Player
Allura Zamarripa
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
43%
(
24 of
56)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Chanelle Van Nguyen
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
47%
(
18 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
50
Total Points Won
46
|
3-6 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chanelle Van Nguyen
Player
Timea Babos
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chanelle Van Nguyen
Player
Victoria Hu
74%
(
67 of
90)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
112)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
112)
100
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 7-5 15-13 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chanelle Van Nguyen
Player
Maribella Zamarripa
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
81
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(6) 5-7 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jenna Defalco
Player
Chanelle Van Nguyen
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
2
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
6
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
51 of
92)
99
Total Points Won
80
|
6-0 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mateas Vs Nguyen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
